As a long-term and highly invested American Idol viewer (meaning I could still describe to you in great detail each one of the velour outfits worn by Season 2 semifinalist Julia DeMato's mom), I perked right up when I read the announcement that for the first time, FOX was going to allow the contestants to have their own officially sanctioned profiles on Twitter, Facebook and Myspace. This was a complete departure from the previous eight seasons of the show - in prior years, contestants have been forced to delete all existing social media profiles, and have been prohibited from creating new ones, as a condition of being on the show.
Two weeks in, FOX has gone back on this decision, citing their inability to hide the number of fans and followers each contestant had as a factor in the move to discontinue contestants' profiles.Why is this a crucial question, anyway? Is there anything about being able to see a contestants' number of followers and fans that makes the competition less fair? Does the predictive power of followers affect the outcome of the show? Does this predictive power even exist?
Let's concern ourselves right now with that last question: What is the predictive power of followers? In other words... is the contestant with the most followers most likely to win the competition?
If we were to try to predict the outcome of American Idol using Zócalo Group's Digital Footprint Index [PDF], we'd take into account three different dimensions of the online conversation around each contestant:
- Height - The sheer number of blog posts, forum conversations, status updates and pieces of multimedia connected to the person, from all sources - official and unofficial.
- Width - The level of engagement and interaction with this stuff. Followers and fans would come in here, as would views, comments and sharing.
- Depth - The tone and content of these conversations. Do people love or hate the contestant? Do they think someone is "pitchy, dawg," or maybe that they've got a Kevin Covais thing going on? Interestingly, WhatNotToSing.com has built an entire database around the potentially predictive nature of online sentiment alone.
- That online conversations are an accurate representation of all conversations - and that there is nothing distinct or disproportionate about a contestant's digital footprint as opposed to his or her overall cultural footprint.
- That a bigger or "better" footprint (digital or cultural), will necessarily translate into more votes.









