Recently in Gordon Dymowski Category


William Castle word of mouth pioneer.jpgExamples of Word of Mouth can be found in the most unlikely places.

Recently, I found myself watching the William Castle inspired documentary, Spine Tingler, a film that documents Castle's intriguing film making throughout the 1950's and 1960's. 

What I find striking about this documentary is how Castle is discussed. Most documentaries speak about the filmmaker's influences, his directorial style, and/or his themes; however, when many of his colleagues and other industry eminents spoke of this esteemed film maker in interviews, they often described William Castle as a "brand", and that for all of his talents as a filmmaker, his strongest asset was that he was a great "marketer." Granted, his reputation was that he was "King of the Gimmick"...but in many ways, William Castle is one of the unsung heroes of word-of-mouth marketing.

In short, William Castle would drive positive customer word-of-mouth about his movies through creative strategies, fostering a pop-culture brand which exists to this day - all of this within the context of the 1950-era media industry.

Castle's strategies for driving customer word of mouth include:

  • Creating unique "brand" experiences for audience members directly within his films.  Even now, he is known for his unique stunts, such as having a skeleton "emerge" from a movie and float through the audience (House on Haunted Hill); having a "punishment poll" to determine the end of a movie (Mr. Sardonicus); and most famously, having theater seats "buzz" a person in order to encourage them to scream, as if they were participating in the film itself (The Tingler).

    Moviegoers - then and now - recognized the director's willingness to create unique experiences for his audience. In short, his "stunts" were the 1950's equivalent of offline WOM campaigns.

  • Developing a distinct personal brand.  Castle would often appear in his movies to provide an introduction (and, of course, to explain the "stunt"). By doing so, he not only helped promote the film, he successfully created a personal brand that came to rival that of fellow filmmaker, Alfred Hitchcock. By closely identifying himself with his movies, Castle created offline buzz strictly due to the force of his personality.

    However, this same technique later backfired when he tried to produce the film version of Rosemary's Baby in the late 1960's. Hollywood saw him as strictly as a "B-movie" director, causing considerable negative word of mouth in the industry, ultimately preventing him from taking the role.

  • Encouraging and driving conversation around key influencers and customers.  Castle would often travel to towns where his films were shot, meeting audience members (primarily 8 to 14 year old's) and interacting with them through special events. Today, we might call this "viral marketing." 

    In addition, Castle developed strong relationships with key influencers within Hollywood, including Harry Cohn, then head of Columbia Studios. In fact, Castle's ability to engage influencers led to his films becoming financially profitable, as well as driving sustainable word of mouth with later influencers like Forrest J. Ackerman, collector Bob Burns, and most notably, John Waters, who wrote a tribute to Castle in the early 1980s.

So, in the spirit of William Castle's pre-WOM efforts, I turn to you, dear reader, and ask - are there any unsung pioneers of WOM? Any one in any context - popular culture, history, technology, business - who embraced word-of-mouth principles long before anyone else? Someone you feel is a true pioneer of WOM?






1 | TrackBacks (0) |

If you were to believe recent reports - or a recent skit on the Emmys - television is dying because more people are watching tv online.

However, in an effort to drive further word of mouth about new shows, many producers, directors and actors are using social media to generate awareness, recommendations, and viewership. Although sites like Hulu have helped this process (and there are plenty of ways to access television shows online), social media allows them to direct recommendations and content sharability (for example, embeddable videos). Cable companies, television stations and even the TV Guide are all using social media to drive viewership and engage their audiences.

Most television shows utilize the power of Twitter as a way of building awareness of their brand, but in unique ways. For example, Dollhouse star, Eliza Duskhu, has been using the service as a way of engaging current fans. The new Fox show, Glee, has also been cited for its presence on various social media platforms. The hit AMC Series, Mad Men, earned initial favor through its unique Twitter strategy, and has even expanded to the point where one can create a Mad Men-style avatar.

tv-shows online.jpgIn addition, blogs that focus on television are also beginning to engage via social media. For example, blogs like TV Squad (which focuses on reviews and news) and Televisionary (which has a more industry focus) have a strong presence on both Facebook and Twitter. Even noted critics like David Bianculi from NPR (a personal favorite of mine) is developing an online presence via blogging and Twitter. Even though they may be posting blog content, this helps drive conversation around various television shows, as fans will engage with particular favorites.

Although social media can create huge buzz for a program, sustaining conversations and viewership requires a strong social media strategy and diversification among these channels.

When ABC premiered its revamp of the British show, Life on Mars, last year, it used a
Twitter account to drive conversations around the first episode (even providing a code for embedding the premiere episode into blogs). However, the Twitter account closed soon after the premiere episode aired, followed by a decline in ratings and finally, a cancellation of the program altogether. ABC's Life on Mars may have  had a little more staying power had it used social media strategically, engaging viewers and critics throughout the series rather than dropping off after the first episode.

So, for all you tv addicts and savvy internet users, how do you think television, or the entertainment industry in general, should use social media to engage (or reengage) their audiences?

 



1 | TrackBacks (0) |
Who would have thought that a social media platform could drive conversation and build the value of a recommendation...simply by taking away features?

Consider Facebook Lite - a "slimmed down" version of Facebook. The new platform was announced after Facebook bought social media aggregator Friendfeed. Originally intended for people with slow internet connections (or areas with low bandwidth), the platform is generating a great deal of conversation, ranging from general features to questions about developing applications. (All this talk about a service being rolled out only in the US and India)

facebook-lite-ss.jpgConversations around the recent Facebook Lite are increasingly positive, focusing on its simplicity and clean interface. However, brands should take note that Facebook Lite does not include Page updates (meaning that users who switch to the service will miss out on conversations). Despite this seeming drawback, Facebook is looking to encourage people to use social media more easily, and the lite service provides a great "introduction" to social media.

In many ways, Facebook is positioning itself as direct competitor to other social media. Recently, the popular platform announced that it was adopting Twitter-style tracking into status updates. By purchasing Friendfeed, Facebook also expands into social media aggregation, promising an ideal one-step platform for integrating conversations across a variety of social media channels. By creating the "lite" version, Facebook promises a more accessible entry point for people unfamiliar with social media, as well as a channel for those who want to live application-free. With Facebook acquiring 300 million members, it has begun focusing on creating unique online experiences while simultaneously maintaining consistent growth. In short, creating a more accessible service like Facebook Lite drives recommendations by providing a platform which eases users into social media experiences.

Facebook is successfully building the value of a recommendation by providing an introductory, unique social media experience which moves towards a more integrated platform.  This has helped the social media giant drive conversation, and people are discussing it both pro (ease of use) and con (minimal brand and application presence).

In short, Facebook is investing in its own social media capital.




1 | TrackBacks (0) |